What should the judge be able to find at the start of my court papers?
What does the reader need in order to understand the next paragraph?
Desk open 24/365 · In writing only: email and e-filing
KSTGeneral information, not legal adviceE-filing centre
PRO SE prepares the structure of the papers, the evidence list and a pre-filing checklist. Logging in, submitting and confirming acceptance are done by the party.
A synthetic example of the table the Evidence role builds. Not a real case.
| Claim | Supporting material | Where it sits | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| The goods did not arrive on the promised day | Order confirmation email | Exhibit A-1, page 1 | Fact |
| The seller knew the date mattered | Chat message about the event | Exhibit A-2 | Inference |
| The delay caused the extra cost | Not yet in hand | Missing | Unconfirmed |
What does the reader need in order to understand the next paragraph?
Which part can I explain from the material, and which part remains an interpretation?
What order makes the relationship between the points understandable?
Where does the wording need to reveal the move from observation to interpretation?
What would allow a reader to locate the intended passage without guessing?
Which words are repetitive, and which keep the meaning accurate?
What is the smallest unresolved difference that still matters?
Where do I need to distinguish what I know from what I infer?