In writing only: email and e-filing

KSTGeneral information, not legal advice

Korea Legislative Reform Tracker

공소청 인권보호사무규칙 일부개정이 바꾸는 절차와 기준 — 제1조·제2조 문언 정리

2026-10-01 공포되어 2026-10-02 시행되는 공소청 인권보호사무규칙(법무부령, 일부개정)의 제개정이유와 개정 조문 범위를 대조해 정리한 연구 노트입니다.

Law: 공소청 인권보호사무규칙 · 법무부령 일부개정 · 2026-10-01 · Articles read: 제1조, 제2조

무엇이 바뀌었나

국가법령정보센터에 공개된 공소청 인권보호사무규칙(법무부령, 2026-10-01 공포, 2026-10-02 시행)의 일부개정이유는 다음과 같이 밝힙니다: 수사와 기소를 분리하기 위하여 검찰청을 폐지하고, 공소청을 신설하는 내용으로 「정부조직법」이 개정(법률 제21065호, 2025. 10. 1. 공포, 2026. 10. 2. 시행)되고, 이에 맞추어 법무부장관 소속으로 공소청을 신설하는 내용으로 「공소청법」이 제정(법률 제21490호, 2026. 3. 24. 공포, 10. 2. 시행 및 법률 제21491호, 2026. 3. 24. 공포, 10. 2. 시행)됨에 따라 종전 검찰청과 관련된 명칭을 정비하는 한편, 검사의 수사권을 폐지하는 내용으로 「형사소송법」이 개정(법률 제21857호, 2026. 8. 4. 공포, 10. 2. 시행)됨에 따라 검사 및 공소청 직원이 인권보호를 위하여 직무 중 지켜야 하도록 규정한 사항에서 수사 관련 사항을 삭제하려는 것임.

이번 일부개정은 상위 법률 개정이나 제도 정비에 맞추어 관련 조문(제1조, 제2조)의 주체·절차·용어를 정비한 것입니다. 원문에 실린 조문 범위 밖의 효력은 추측하지 않습니다.

조문으로 확인할 것

Readers may directly compare the pre-amendment and post-amendment texts of Article 1 and Article 2 in the table comparing old and new provisions and in the reasons for enactment and amendment at the National Law Information Center source link (https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=290933). In particular, how the authority holder, the counterparties to notification and enforcement, and the requirement wording have changed must be read with distinctions made at the sentence level.

What standard the transitional provisions (Addendum) between the promulgation date (2026-10-01) and the enforcement date (2026-10-02) apply to procedures already in progress or to facts that arose previously must also be verified by comparing the main text and the Addendum together.

입법에 묻는 것

How does the text of this partial amendment of the Rule on Human Rights Protection Affairs of the Prosecution Service change or specify who becomes the subject of judgment and enforcement, and on what criteria, in practice and procedure? Does the reorganization of terminology and the provision system maintain continuity with the rights and obligations relations of the preceding procedure, or does it require separate interpretive standards?

When the amended Article 1 and Article 2 are applied to actual case Records and disposition procedures after the enforcement date (2026-10-02), what remains to be additionally clarified in subordinate regulations or enforcement guidelines with respect to the parties' right of defense or right to participate in procedure, or channels for raising objections?

다시 볼 조건

If a subsequent amendment of the Rule on Human Rights Protection Affairs of the Prosecution Service, or further reorganization of related higher-level Acts, Enforcement Decrees, or Enforcement Rules, is promulgated, this note will be rewritten. At that time, the changed provision numbers and the point of application of the Supplementary Provisions will be re-compared against the source and updated.

Official text

A research note read from the official amendment reason and the changed articles before and after, as the National Law Information Center publishes them. An AI drafts the note and its article references are checked against that text. It asks what the wording leaves open; it is not a finding that any provision is invalid, and not advice on any matter. Written 2026-10-15

Back to Law Reform
You are reading PRO SE
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com