In writing only: email and e-filing

KSTGeneral information, not legal advice

Korea Legislative Reform Tracker

군검찰 압수물 사무규칙 일부개정이 바꾸는 절차와 기준 — 제1조·제2조 문언 정리

2026-10-02 공포되어 2026-10-02 시행되는 군검찰 압수물 사무규칙(국방부령, 일부개정)의 제개정이유와 개정 조문 범위를 대조해 정리한 연구 노트입니다.

Law: 군검찰 압수물 사무규칙 · 국방부령 일부개정 · 2026-10-02 · Articles read: 제1조, 제2조

무엇이 바뀌었나

국가법령정보센터에 공개된 군검찰 압수물 사무규칙(국방부령, 2026-10-02 공포, 2026-10-02 시행)의 일부개정이유는 다음과 같이 밝힙니다: 수사·기소 기관 간 상호 견제가 가능한 체계를 구축하기 위하여 검찰청을 폐지하고, 법무부장관 소속으로 공소청과 행정안전부장관 소속으로 중대범죄수사청을 각각 신설하는 내용으로 「공소청법」(법률 제21490호, 2026. 3. 24. 공포, 10. 2. 시행)과 「중대범죄수사청 조직 및 운영에 관한 법률」(법률 제21491호, 2026. 3. 24. 공포, 10. 2. 시행)이 제정되고, 수사와 기소가 제도적으로 분리되는 새로운 형사사법 체계의 행정조직 기반이 마련되는 등의 내용으로 「형사소송법」(법률 제21857호, 2026. 8. 4. 공포, 10. 2. 시행)이 개정됨에 따라, 이에 맞추어 군 수사기관 관련 규정의 용어를 정비하려는 것임.

이번 일부개정은 상위 법률 개정이나 제도 정비에 맞추어 관련 조문(제1조, 제2조)의 주체·절차·용어를 정비한 것입니다. 원문에 실린 조문 범위 밖의 효력은 추측하지 않습니다.

조문으로 확인할 것

Readers may directly compare the wording of Article 1 and Article 2 before and after the amendment, through the table comparing the provisions before and after the amendment and the reasons for enactment and amendment in the original text at the Korea Law Information Center link (https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=290959). In particular, how the holders of authority, the counterparts of notification and enforcement, and the wording of the requirements have changed must be read on a sentence-by-sentence basis.

What standard the transitional provisions (Addendum) between the promulgation date (2026-10-02) and the enforcement date (2026-10-02) apply to procedures already in progress or to facts that arose previously must also be verified by comparing the main text and the Addendum together.

입법에 묻는 것

How does the wording of this partial amendment of the Rules on the Handling of Seized Articles of Military Prosecution change or specify, in practical procedures, who becomes the subject of determination and enforcement and on what standard? Does the alignment of terminology and the system of provisions maintain continuity with the relations of rights and obligations under the prior procedures, or does it require a separate standard of interpretation?

When the amended Article 1 and Article 2 are applied to actual case Records and disposition procedures after the enforcement date (2026-10-02), what remains to be additionally clarified in subordinate regulations or enforcement guidelines with respect to the parties' right of defense or right to participate in procedure, or channels for raising objections?

다시 볼 조건

This note will be rewritten if and when subsequent amendments to the Rules on the Handling of Seized Articles of Military Prosecution, or further alignment of the relevant higher-level statutes, Enforcement Decrees, or Enforcement Rules, are promulgated. At that time, the amended article numbers and the point of application of the Addendum will be re-compared against the original text and updated.

Official text

A research note read from the official amendment reason and the changed articles before and after, as the National Law Information Center publishes them. An AI drafts the note and its article references are checked against that text. It asks what the wording leaves open; it is not a finding that any provision is invalid, and not advice on any matter. Written 2026-10-15

Back to Law Reform
You are reading PRO SE
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com