What must a practice file show for a worker to report that a finalised correction order has not been carried out, and how does compliance information reach the Minister?
General information · Not legal advice
Material to check
In a practice file under the Act on Gender Equality in Employment and Work–Family Reconciliation we read the worker's correction application, to confirm the reporting person is the one who made it, the finalised correction order, to see what the employer was ordered to do, and any compliance-status submission the employer has already sent to the Minister.
These are types of material to look for, not evidence already verified by PRO SE.
Where readings differ
One reading holds that the Minister of Employment and Labor may require the employer to submit the state of compliance with a finalised correction order, and that the worker who filed the correction application may report to the Minister where the employer has not carried it out. Both are written as 'may', so neither duty follows automatically.
Another reading notes what the provision leaves open: it does not say what the report or the compliance-status submission must show, in what form they must be sent, or whether the reporting worker receives a copy. It also leaves the Minister's response to a report unaddressed, so a file must show the facts itself rather than assume a paper will come back.
Your judgment
If the employer submits a compliance-status paper claiming full performance, what in the file would let the worker show the order was still not carried out?
PRO SE does not make this decision or keep a case record on this public site.When to reconsider
We look again if the provision is amended to state what the report must contain or to give the reporting worker a copy of the compliance-status submission, or if an official decision explains how the Minister treats a report of non-compliance.