When the head of the classification institute must make results viewable by the institutions executing a protective disposition, which juveniles and which results does that reach?
General information · Not legal advice
Material to check
For this exercise, the papers to read are the classification or counselling-investigation report and opinion that the classification institute issued, the decision ordering a protective disposition, and the record showing which juvenile detention centre or probation office is executing that disposition.
These are types of material to look for, not evidence already verified by PRO SE.
Where readings differ
One reading follows the conditions in order: where a juvenile falling within the first three categories the provision refers to receives a decision on a protective disposition, the head of the classification institute must notify the juvenile detention centre or probation office executing that disposition, in a way that the results and opinion, or the counselling-investigation results and opinion, can be viewed through the information system, and without delay.
Another reading notes that the first paragraph, by contrast, covers a wider set of categories and sends results to the juvenile department of a court or to the prosecutor, while this paragraph reaches only the institutions executing the disposition, so the provision leaves open which paper in the file shows that a given institution is the one executing it.
Your judgment
How does the file show that a given juvenile falls within the categories this paragraph reaches rather than the wider set the first paragraph covers?
PRO SE does not make this decision or keep a case record on this public site.When to reconsider
We look at this again if the provision is amended to change the categories or the recipients it reaches, or if a decision explains how the information-system view must be provided.