Which kinds of amount does this provision put under the collection rules borrowed from the premium collection act this provision names, and which body collects them?
General information · Not legal advice
Material to check
The practice file to read here holds the decision or notice that fixed each benefit amount or the unjust enrichment, the payment and demand records showing which of the four named kinds is at issue, and correspondence from the Corporation identifying the collection rule it relies on.
These are types of material to look for, not evidence already verified by PRO SE.
Where readings differ
One reading takes the four kinds of amount the provision names — the insurance benefit amount it specifies, the disability special benefit amount, the bereaved family special benefit amount and the amount of unjust enrichment — and applies to their collection the articles the provision lists from the premium collection act it names, read mutatis mutandis, with the Corporation acting where the substitution clause places it in the Health Insurance Service's position.
Another reading marks a limit: the borrowed collection rules reach only the amounts the provision names, so an ordinary benefit payment or a premium demand falls outside this text, and the provision leaves open how far 'mutatis mutandis' alters the periods and figures written into the borrowed articles.
Your judgment
If a demand cites this provision for an amount that is not one of the four named, what in the file shows which collection rule actually applies?
PRO SE does not make this decision or keep a case record on this public site.When to reconsider
We revisit this card if the provision is amended to add another kind of amount or to change the substitution of the Corporation for the Health Insurance Service, or if a court decision explains how far the borrowed articles apply unchanged.