In writing only: email and e-filing

KSTGeneral information, not legal advice
Synthetic · simulationNot a real case

In a juvenile case, on what may a juvenile department judge order a guardian to attend special protection education, and where is it run?

General information · Not legal advice

Material to check

The exercise material's disposition decision shows which juvenile department judge handled the case and what was decided. Papers on family circumstances, and any record of the special protection education run by a juvenile institution, classification centre or probation office, bear on the conditions this paragraph sets.

These are types of material to look for, not evidence already verified by PRO SE.

Where readings differ

One reading keeps every condition this paragraph attaches: the juvenile department judge may make the order, having considered family circumstances and the like, where the judge judges it necessary, and what is ordered is that the guardian receive special protection education for protecting juveniles, run by a juvenile institution, classification centre or probation office or similar body.

Another reading stresses what this paragraph does not say: unlike the earlier paragraphs, it is not tied to any disposition under the two named items, it binds the guardian rather than the juvenile, and it leaves open how strong a showing of necessity is needed before the order may be made.

Your judgment

Once family circumstances are in the papers, what would show the judge that ordering the guardian's attendance is necessary rather than merely useful?

PRO SE does not make this decision or keep a case record on this public site.

When to reconsider

We look at this again if the provision is amended to change who may be ordered to attend or which bodies run the special education, or if a court decision sets what necessity requires before the order is made.

Take this question furtherWhat stays with the party
You are reading PRO SE
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com