In writing only: email and e-filing

KSTGeneral information, not legal advice
Synthetic · simulationNot a real case

Which kinds of case does a High Court decide concerning a military court's trial, and which High Court is it?

General information · Not legal advice

Material to check

In a practice file of this kind, we read the military court's judgment or ruling, the notice of appeal or application that names the High Court it is filed with, and any other statute said to place the matter in a High Court's authority.

These are types of material to look for, not evidence already verified by PRO SE.

Where readings differ

One reading takes the categories the provision names in turn: a High Court tries an appeal against a trial of a military court, an interlocutory application matter concerning such a trial, and any other case that another law places within a High Court's authority, and no other kind of case falls within its adjudicating power.

Another reading turns on the provision's naming of a single court: the High Court hearing these matters is the Seoul High Court designated for this purpose in the Schedule to the Act on Establishment and Jurisdiction of Courts, and the provision says nothing about which court would hear a matter that fits none of the named categories.

Your judgment

If a filing rests on a statute other than this one, what in the file would show that the matter is one another law places in a High Court's authority?

PRO SE does not make this decision or keep a case record on this public site.

When to reconsider

We look at this again if the provision is amended to add or remove a category of case, or if the Schedule to the Act on Establishment and Jurisdiction of Courts ceases to place these matters with the Seoul High Court.

Take this question furtherWhat stays with the party
You are reading PRO SE
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com