When a juvenile's temporary release has been revoked, who must re-admit them, and on what finding does that duty arise?
General information · Not legal advice
Material to check
For this practice exercise, the papers to read are the temporary release order, the record showing that the release was revoked under the Act on Probation and Other Measures on Persons under Protection, and any intake or transport record showing when the person was brought back to the institution.
These are types of material to look for, not evidence already verified by PRO SE.
Where readings differ
One reading takes the paragraph at its word: once a temporary release has been revoked under the part of the Act on Probation and Other Measures on Persons under Protection that this provision points to, the head of the juvenile institution 'shall', without delay, take that person back into custody, so the duty is not discretionary and does not wait on any further finding.
Another reading notes that the paragraph fixes the actor and the trigger but leaves the pace of 'without delay' undefined, and it does not say which paper proves the revocation or how the head of the institution is to act where the person is not yet at the institution when the revocation takes effect.
Your judgment
When the file shows the revocation but no date of return, what record could establish whether the head of the institution acted without delay?
PRO SE does not make this decision or keep a case record on this public site.When to reconsider
We revisit this card if the provision is amended to name a different actor, to point to a different part of the probation statute, or to set a defined period, or if a court decision explains what 'without delay' requires in this setting.