In writing only: email and e-filing

KSTGeneral information, not legal advice
Synthetic · simulationNot a real case

Which applications oblige the military court to decide, and does the provision give the court any choice about deciding?

General information · Not legal advice

Material to check

For this exercise, the practice file holds the written application as filed with the military court, so its contents can be read against the two applications this provision refers to, together with the military court's ruling on it and any paper showing when that ruling was served.

These are types of material to look for, not evidence already verified by PRO SE.

Where readings differ

One reading takes the wording as mandatory: where an application made under the two provisions the provision names is before it, the military court 'shall' make a ruling, so the filing of such an application removes any choice about whether to decide.

Another reading marks the boundaries of that duty: the provision says only that the military court rules on such an application, and says nothing about what the ruling must contain, when it must be made, or how it reaches the applicant, so those points are not settled by this provision.

Your judgment

If the ruling does not deal with everything the application asked for, how could the file show whether the duty to decide has been met?

PRO SE does not make this decision or keep a case record on this public site.

When to reconsider

We look at this again if the provision is amended to add a time limit or required contents for the ruling, or if a court decision explains what a ruling on such an application must decide.

Take this question furtherWhat stays with the party
You are reading PRO SE
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com