Which kinds of ruling does this provision bar a party from appealing on their own, and on what does that bar depend?
General information · Not legal advice
Material to check
In a practice file we read the ruling itself, to see whether it was made on litigation costs or on provisional execution, the two kinds the provision names, and we check the date and the court record so that the ruling's subject is clear from the papers.
These are types of material to look for, not evidence already verified by PRO SE.
Where readings differ
One reading takes the bar as written: an appeal of one's own may not be taken against a ruling concerning litigation costs or a ruling concerning provisional execution, so those two kinds of ruling are the ones the provision removes from independent appeal.
Another reading notes that the provision bars the independent appeal and says nothing more, so it leaves open what may be done with such a ruling otherwise, and it names only these two kinds, leaving rulings of other kinds untouched by this bar.
Your judgment
On the face of the papers, is the ruling before the party one concerning litigation costs or provisional execution, or something else the provision does not name?
PRO SE does not make this decision or keep a case record on this public site.When to reconsider
We look at this again if the provision is amended to widen or narrow the kinds of ruling it names, or if a court decision explains what makes a ruling one concerning litigation costs or provisional execution.