Once an administrative appeal has ended in an administrative lawsuit, which agency must report the case, to which committee, and by when?
General information · Not legal advice
Material to check
In a practice file, we read the ruling on the administrative appeal, since it names the committee that decided the case, and the papers showing that an administrative lawsuit was later filed under the Administrative Litigation Act, since that is the event triggering the duty. The agency's semi-annual reporting records matter because they show whether and when the report was sent.
These are types of material to look for, not evidence already verified by PRO SE.
Where readings differ
One reading takes the duty as written: after a suit of the appeal type under the Administrative Litigation Act has been filed, the administrative agency must tell, half-yearly by the fifteenth day of the following month, the central administrative appeal committee that ruled on the appeal, or the committee placed under the head of a city or province, about the case, reporting matters such as its content or result as prescribed by Presidential Decree.
Another reading notes a limit the provision itself draws: the duty reaches only a case that first went through administrative appeal under this Act and then became a lawsuit under the Administrative Litigation Act, so a suit filed without an appeal, or an appeal still pending, falls outside what this reporting duty covers.
Your judgment
If the file does not show plainly which committee ruled on the appeal, what record would establish the right recipient of the agency's report?
PRO SE does not make this decision or keep a case record on this public site.When to reconsider
We revisit this card if the provision is amended to change the deadline, the recipients or the triggering event, if the Presidential Decree sets out the matters to be reported, or if a court decision clarifies which agency bears the duty.