Who may carry out a warrant for accompaniment in a family protection case, and does the provision decide which of them acts?
General information · Not legal advice
Material to check
In a practice file we read the warrant itself and the record or report of execution to see who carried it out, and any paper showing that person's office, since the provision identifies each permitted executor by the post held rather than by name.
These are types of material to look for, not evidence already verified by PRO SE.
Where readings differ
One reading takes the list as the whole scope: the warrant for accompaniment may be executed by a family protection case investigator, by a court official of the grades the provision names, or by a judicial police officer, and the wording 'may have it executed' permits these routes without commanding any one of them.
Another reading notes a limit: the provision identifies the permitted executors only by the office each holds, so it does not say who selects the route, which of them must act first, or what follows where the file shows execution by a person holding none of the listed posts.
Your judgment
If the execution paper names a person and no file document shows that person held one of the listed posts, what could establish the status the provision requires?
PRO SE does not make this decision or keep a case record on this public site.When to reconsider
We look at this again if the provision is amended to add or remove the categories of person who may execute the warrant, or if a court decision addresses what the file must show about the executor's post.