Open Decision Ledger · Tax & international taxation
No principal tax liability, no surtax on returned imports
Supreme Court, Feb. 14, 2019, 2015Du52616 (judgment)
Case name: 관세등부과처분취소
Official text on the National Law Information Center
Question
Where imported goods are sent back to the exporter under Article 106(1)(i) of the Customs Act so that no customs duty or value-added tax is owed, may the authority still impose the under-declaration and late-payment surtaxes, and may a customs surtax liability arise where there is no “shortfall of duty” to collect?
Holding
No. The Supreme Court held that quality, specification or quantity of imported goods which do not match the originally agreed specification carry no customs duty or value-added tax liability once they are sent back to the exporter under the procedure set by statute. Surtax is an independent tax added to the principal amount, and where the provision imposing it takes for granted a validly fixed principal tax and a failure to declare or pay in time, it cannot be imposed separately when no principal tax is owed; the same applies to customs duty. A customs surtax under Article 42(1) of the Customs Act likewise presupposes that the principal liability ultimately exists, so that surtax liability alone cannot stand where there is no shortfall of duty on which it rests.
Summary of the holding, verbatim
무신고·과소신고·납부불성실 가산세 등은 신고·납부할 본세의 납세의무가 인정되지 아니하는 경우에 이를 따로 부과할 수 없다고 할 것이고, 이는 관세의 경우에도 마찬가지이다.
Unofficial English translation
Surtaxes such as non-filing, under-reporting, and late payment surtaxes cannot be separately imposed where no tax liability for the principal tax to be reported and paid is recognized, and the same applies in the case of customs duties.
Disposition
Dismissed Stated in the decision
상고를 기각한다. 상고비용은 피고가 부담한다.
Unofficial English translation
The appeal is dismissed. The appeal costs shall be borne by the defendant.
Form of the test
Elements stated Stated in the decision
성질상 그 부과의 기초가 되는 “부족한 관세액”이 없는 이상 가산세 납세의무만 따로 인정될 수 없다.
Unofficial English translation
Given that, by its nature, there is no "amount of customs duties in deficiency" that serves as the basis for its imposition, a tax liability for surtaxes alone cannot be recognized.
Factors
- 가산세 부과의 근거가 되는 법률 규정에서 본세의 세액이 유효하게 확정되어 있을 것을 전제로
- 그 의무를 이행하지 아니한 데 대한 정당한 사유가 있는 경우에는
- 품질, 규격, 수량 등이 원래의 계약된 명세와 일치하지 않은 수입물품은 법령에 정한 절차에 따라 수출자에게 되돌려 보내는 경우
- 성질상 그 부과의 기초가 되는 “부족한 관세액”이 없는 이상
Unofficial English translation
• in the legal provision serving as the basis for the imposition of surtaxes, on the premise that the tax amount of the principal tax has been validly determined
• where there is a justifiable reason for failing to perform that obligation
• in the case where imported goods whose quality, specifications, quantity, etc. do not match the originally contracted specifications are returned to the exporter pursuant to the procedures prescribed by statutes and regulations
• given that, by its nature, there is no "amount of customs duties in deficiency" that serves as the basis for its imposition
Relation to precedent
Follows earlier decisions Stated in the decision
대법원 2018. 11. 29. 선고 2015두56120 판결(공2019상, 198)
Unofficial English translation
Supreme Court Decision 2015Du56120 decided November 29, 2018 (Gong 2019 Sang, 198)
Decisions referred to
[1][3] 대법원 2018. 11. 29. 선고 2015두56120 판결(공2019상, 198), 대법원 2018. 11. 29. 선고 2016두53180 판결(공2019상, 210) / [1] 대법원 2014. 4. 24. 선고 2013두27128 판결(공2014상, 1152)
Burden of proof
Not addressed Not in the decision
Open question and revisit condition
If part of an imported consignment fails the quality check and is returned while the remainder is lawfully cleared, on which goods may the surtax be imposed?
A later decision reading Article 42(1) of the Customs Act or Article 47-3 and Article 47-4 of the Framework Act on National Taxes differently would require this entry to be read again. So would an amendment to those surtax provisions or to Article 106(1)(i) of the Customs Act on refunds.
Cross-family AI independent reading & axis check
7 of 8 axes matched GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI, codex CLI) · 2026-10-25
A reader from another model family (GPT-6 Astra), given the official text but not the primary reading, agreed on 7 of the 8 axes; the readings differed on axis 8 (open question and revisit condition).
Axis 8 (Open question and revisit condition): Primary “If part of an imported consignment fails the quality check and is returned while the remainder is lawfully cleared, on which goods may the surtax be imposed?” vs Independent “How would the penalty analysis change if the returned goods failed to satisfy a statutory refund requirement?”
The primary reading asks about partial return of a consignment where the remainder is cleared, while the independent reading asks what happens if returned goods fail a statutory refund requirement.
무신고·과소신고·납부불성실 가산세 등은 신고·납부할 본세의 납세의무가 인정되지 아니하는 경우에 이를 따로 부과할 수 없다고 할 것이고, 이는 관세의 경우에도 마찬가지이다.Raw responses and comparison record: Protocol · Blind readings (JSONL) · Axis comparison (JSONL) · SHA-256 (JSON)
Lower-court contrast & scope of application
Lower-court reading vs. Supreme Court holding
Lower-court context: The Seoul High Court, in its judgment of 8 September 2015 (2014Nu71315), accepted the importer's claim and held the surtax assessments unlawful. On the same reasoning as the Supreme Court, it reasoned that because the customs duty and value-added tax paid on the returned goods had been refunded in full, no shortfall of principal tax could arise, and the surtax therefore had no basis.
Supreme Court standard: The Supreme Court found no error. It held that the court below had neither misunderstood the law on the relationship between surtax and principal tax nor the purpose of the refund regime, and the Justices unanimously dismissed the defendant's appeal, with the appeal costs on the defendant.
Distinguishing conditions
- Imported goods whose quality, specification or quantity did match the originally agreed specification, so that the refund regime under Article 106(1)(i) of the Customs Act is unavailable and the principal liability stands.
- Goods whose nature or form had changed at the time of the import declaration, or which were not put into a bonded area and re-exported within one year of acceptance of the import declaration.
- A surtax imposed as a sanction for breach of a separate cooperative duty, which the decision says may be imposed independently of the principal tax liability.
Record verification notes
Set out each import declaration with its acceptance date, the declared tariff rate and the duty and value-added tax paid, then the quality verification result, the re-export declaration and date under Article 106 of the Customs Act, and the refund decision and date. Check whether the refund covered the whole duty and value-added tax on the returned goods, since the rule bites only where no principal tax remains. Then identify the exact surtax provision invoked, Article 42(1)(i) or (ii) of the Customs Act, Article 47-3 or Article 47-4 of the Framework Act on National Taxes, and ask whether a shortfall of duty exists at the close of argument.
From the official text
Points at issue
[1] 신고·납부할 본세의 납세의무가 인정되지 않는 경우 본세의 세액이 유효하게 확정되어 있을 것을 전제로 하는 무신고·과소신고·납부불성실 가산세 등을 부과할 수 있는지 여부(소극) 및 이는 관세의 경우에도 마찬가지인지 여부(적극) [2] 품질, 규격, 수량 등이 원래의 계약된 명세와 일치하지 않은 수입물품을 법령에 정한 절차에 따라 수출자에게 되돌려 보내는 경우, 그에 대한 관세와 부가가치세 납세의무가 있는지 여부(소극) [3] 관세법 제42조 제1항에 따른 관세 가산세의 부과의 기초가 되는 ‘부족한 관세액’이 없는 경우 가산세 납세의무가 인정되는지 여부(소극)
Unofficial English translation
[1] Whether surtaxes such as non-filing, under-reporting, and late payment surtaxes, which premise that the tax amount of the principal tax has been validly determined, may be imposed where no tax liability for the principal tax to be reported and paid is recognized (negative), and whether the same applies in the case of customs duties (affirmative) [2] Where imported goods whose quality, specifications, quantity, etc. do not match the originally contracted specifications are returned to the exporter pursuant to the procedures prescribed by statutes and regulations, whether there is a tax liability for customs duties and value-added tax (negative) [3] Where there is no "amount of customs duties in deficiency" that serves as the basis for the imposition of customs surtaxes under Article 42 (1) of the Customs Act, whether a tax liability for surtaxes is recognized (negative)
Summary of the holding
[1] 가산세는 세법에서 규정하는 의무의 성실한 이행을 확보하기 위하여 세법에 따라 산출한 본세액에 가산하여 징수하는 독립된 조세로서, 본세에 감면사유가 인정된다고 하여 가산세도 감면대상에 포함되는 것이 아니고, 반면에 그 의무를 이행하지 아니한 데 대한 정당한 사유가 있는 경우에는 본세 납세의무가 있더라도 가산세는 부과하지 않는다(국세기본법 제2조 제4호, 제47조, 제48조 등 참조). 가산세의 종류에 따라서는 본세 납세의무와 무관하게 별도의 협력의무 위반에 대한 제재로서 부과되는 가산세도 있으나, 가산세 부과의 근거가 되는 법률 규정에서 본세의 세액이 유효하게 확정되어 있을 것을 전제로 납세의무자가 법정기한까지 과세표준과 세액을 제대로 신고하거나 납부하지 않은 것을 요건으로 하는 무신고·과소신고·납부불성실 가산세 등은 신고·납부할 본세의 납세의무가 인정되지 아니하는 경우에 이를 따로 부과할 수 없다고 할 것이고, 이는 관세의 경우에도 마찬가지이다. [2] 관세법 제106조 제1항 제1호는 수입신고가 수리된 물품이 계약 내용과 다르고 수입신고 당시의 성질이나 형태가 변경되지 아니한 경우 수입신고 수리일부터 1년 이내에 보세구역에 이를 반입하였다가 다시 수출한 때에는 그 관세를 환급하도록 규정하고 있고, 이러한 경우에는 구 부가가치세법 시행령(2013. 6. 28. 대통령령 제24683호로 전부 개정되기 전의 것) 제71조 제2항에 의하여 부가가치세도 지체 없이 환급하여야 한다. 이에 따라 품질, 규격, 수량 등이 원래의 계약된 명세와 일치하지 않은 수입물품은 법령에 정한 절차에 따라 수출자에게 되돌려 보내는 경우 그에 대한 관세와 부가가치세 납세의무가 없다. [3] 관세법 제42조 제1항은 “부족한 관세액을 징수할 때”에 “해당 부족세액의 100분의 10”(제1호)과 “해당 부족세액”에 일정한 비율을 곱하여 산정한 금액(제2호)을 가산세로 정하고 있다. 위 각호의 규정에 따른 관세 가산세는 국세기본법의 무신고·과소신고·납부불성실 가산세와 마찬가지로 본세 납세의무가 최종적으로 존재하는 것을 전제로 하는 것으로서, 성질상 그 부과의 기초가 되는 “부족한 관세액”이 없는 이상 가산세 납세의무만 따로 인정될 수 없다.
Order
상고를 기각한다. 상고비용은 피고가 부담한다.
Unofficial English translation
The appeal is dismissed. The appeal costs shall be borne by the defendant.
Provisions referred to
[1] 국세기본법 제2조 제4호, 제47조, 제48조, 관세법 제42조 제1항 [2] 관세법 제106조 제1항 제1호, 구 부가가치세법 시행령(2013. 6. 28. 대통령령 제24683호로 전부 개정되기 전의 것) 제71조 제2항(현행 제105조 참조) [3] 관세법 제42조 제1항 제1호, 제2호, 국세기본법 제2조 제4호, 제47조, 제48조
Read 2026-10-25 · Cross-read 2026-10-25. All quotes matched against the official text. The Chinese-character placeholders the court used for anonymised parties are given in their Korean readings, and parenthetical Chinese-character glosses are omitted.
Every entry is published only after all quotes have been matched character by character against the official text, and audited by an independent second reading from a different model family across all eight axes. Both agreed axes and text-grounded interpretive divergences are recorded openly. The ledger is a research record, not an assessment of the court or advice on any matter.
Back to the ledger