Monograph Series · Third series › Part I Framing the claim and access to court › III-03 · First edition
Those Who Litigate Another's Right: The Basis of Standing to Conduct Litigation
When the holder of a right and the person conducting the litigation differ, does the remedy still reach the right holder?
Volume contents
- Abstract
- Synthetic case
- 01The Right Preserved by Subrogation
- 02Rights That Cannot Be Exercised by Subrogation
- 03Litigation Conducted Pursuant to Selection
- 04Succession During the Pendency of the Suit
- 05Identification of the Right Holder
- 06Distinguishing Standing to Conduct Litigation from the Substantive Right
Abstract
This volume asks whether, when the holder of a right and the person conducting the litigation differ, the remedy still reaches that right holder. Only when both the basis of the standing to conduct litigation and the person to whom the effect of the judgment will accrue are stated can subrogation, selection, and succession be distinguished from a mere lending of one's name. The path to relief opens where the subrogating creditor's preserved claim and the need for preservation, or the basis of the standing to conduct litigation arising from selection or succession, are recognized, and closes where the subrogating creditor's preserved claim is not recognized or there is no statutory basis for litigating on behalf of another. The six sections address, in turn, the right preserved by subrogation, rights that cannot be exercised by subrogation, litigation conducted pursuant to selection, succession during the pendency of the suit, identification of the right holder, and the distinction between standing to conduct litigation and the substantive right. The strongest counterargument is as follows. Requiring the direct participation of the right holder would effectively block collective and subrogated protection of rights. Diagrams of party relationships and the management of parallel proceedings are not addressed in this volume.
Synthetic case
The whole volume follows this invented case. It is not a real matter, and its facts are not legal findings.
Creditor A seeks to exercise a right of Debtor B but has not separately put forward any grounds for A's own claim or for the need for preservation.
6 sections and their questions
- 01The Right Preserved by Subrogation
Can one exercise another's right without a claim of one's own?
22 min - 02Rights That Cannot Be Exercised by Subrogation
Are all of the debtor's rights subject to subrogation?
20 min - 03Litigation Conducted Pursuant to Selection
Does a common interest automatically create the authority to represent?
18 min - 04Succession During the Pendency of the Suit
When a right has been transferred, how does the time of the litigation continue?
20 min - 05Identification of the Right Holder
Does a declaratory judgment that fails to identify the right holder still achieve its purpose?
21 min - 06Distinguishing Standing to Conduct Litigation from the Substantive Right
Does a determination that one may conduct the suit also mean that the right exists?
18 min