In writing only: email and e-filing

KSTGeneral information, not legal advice

Monograph Series · Third series › Part II Fact-finding and the control of the hearing › III-11 · First edition

Document Production and Obstruction of Proof: Reaching the Other Party's Materials

When the refusal of the party holding the key documents blocks a remedy, what can the court do?

Part
Part II Fact-finding and the control of the hearing
Sections
6 sections
Length
about 29,800 words · 2 h 10 min
As of
2026-10-15
Volume contents
  1. Abstract
  2. Synthetic case
  3. 01The Starting Point of the Duty to Produce
  4. 02The Label of "Internal Document"
  5. 03Relevance and Necessity
  6. 04Partial Production and In Camera Review
  7. 05The Effects of Noncompliance
  8. 06Destruction and Obstruction of Proof

Abstract

This volume asks what the court can do when the refusal of the opposing party holding the key documents blocks relief. Only if the duty to produce, necessity, and the protection of confidentiality are heard separately, and the effect of noncompliance is linked to the assertions concerning the contents of the documents, will access to materials not turn directly into an automatic victory. The path to relief opens where the duty to produce documents, relevance, and the need for examination of evidence are recognized and the limits under the statutory grounds for protection are satisfied, and closes where the application for document production is not granted because no duty to produce is recognized or there is no need for examination of evidence. The six sections address, in turn, the starting point of the duty to produce, the label of "internal document", relevance and necessity, partial production and in camera review, the effects of noncompliance, and destruction and obstruction of proof. The strongest counterargument is as follows. Disclosure of documents may irreparably harm trade secrets and the rights of third parties. The technical operation of data preservation, hashing, and chain of custody is not addressed in this volume.

Synthetic case

The whole volume follows this invented case. It is not a real matter, and its facts are not legal findings.

Plaintiff A applies for production of approval documents held by Defendant B, and Defendant B refuses to produce any of them on the ground that they are internal documents.

6 sections and their questions

  1. 01The Starting Point of the Duty to Produce

    Is the opposing party obliged to produce every document in its possession?

    24 min
  2. 02The Label of "Internal Document"

    May production be refused solely because a document was created within the company?

    21 min
  3. 03Relevance and Necessity

    Where a duty to produce exists, must the court always order production?

    23 min
  4. 04Partial Production and In Camera Review

    Where confidentiality and the need for proof overlap, must everything be given up?

    22 min
  5. 05The Effects of Noncompliance

    If an order is refused, what may be recognized as true?

    19 min
  6. 06Destruction and Obstruction of Proof

    Does the mere fact that a document has disappeared constitute obstruction?

    20 min
You are reading PRO SE
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com