In writing only: email and e-filing

KSTGeneral information, not legal advice

Monograph Series · Third series › Part III Forming the judgment and procedural legitimacy › III-18 · First edition

Public Trials and the Protection of Records: The Scope of a Visible Judgment

Can a trial be held in public while protecting the parties' secrets and safety?

Part
Part III Forming the judgment and procedural legitimacy
Sections
6 sections
Length
about 29,000 words · 2 h 6 min
As of
2026-10-15
Volume contents
  1. Abstract
  2. Synthetic case
  3. 01Public Hearings and Public Pronouncement
  4. 02Who May Access the Records
  5. 03Limiting the Secret Portions
  6. 04Risk of Harm and Personal Information
  7. 05Separate Rules for the Disclosure of Written Judgments
  8. 06The Boundary Between Use and Harm

Abstract

This volume asks whether a trial can be held in public while protecting the parties' secrets and safety. The openness of hearings, the parties' access to records, and the general public's access to written judgments are distinct entitlements. Only by separating the portions to be protected from the persons seeking access can openness and safety be protected together. The path to relief opens where the distinct access requirements for hearings, written judgments, and litigation records are met and access is sought within the scope outside statutory restrictions, and closes where access to designated portions is restricted because protection of the relevant secrets or against harm, or a statutory ground for exclusion, has been recognized. The six sections address, in turn, public hearings and public pronouncement of judgments, who may access records, limiting the secret portions, risk of harm and personal information, separate rules for the disclosure of written judgments, and the boundary between use and harm. The strongest counterargument is as follows. Repeated partial restrictions may effectively collapse the principle of openness. Requests for information disclosure in general, freedom of research, and the protection of secrets in open research are not addressed in this volume.

Synthetic case

The whole volume follows this invented case. It is not a real matter, and its facts are not legal findings.

Plaintiff A demands the provision of the entire record on the ground that the trial was public, and Defendant B asserts a risk arising from exposure of B's address.

6 sections and their questions

  1. 01Public Hearings and Public Pronouncement

    When may a trial be held in private?

    19 min
  2. 02Who May Access the Records

    If the courtroom is open, may all records also be freely viewed?

    24 min
  3. 03Limiting the Secret Portions

    If there is a secret, must the entire case be concealed?

    21 min
  4. 04Risk of Harm and Personal Information

    Is there information that may be withheld even from the opposing party?

    22 min
  5. 05Separate Rules for the Disclosure of Written Judgments

    Are judgments that have not become final also subject to disclosure?

    21 min
  6. 06The Boundary Between Use and Harm

    May records that have been lawfully read be used in any manner?

    19 min
You are reading PRO SE
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com