In writing only: email and e-filing

KSTGeneral information, not legal advice

Monograph Series · Third series › Part VII Combining remedies and the gaps that remain › III-43 · First edition

Combining Contract Remedies: Performance, Rescission, and Damages

How does the choice to keep or end a contract change the scope of recovery?

Part
Part VII Combining remedies and the gaps that remain
Sections
6 sections
Length
about 28,900 words · 2 h 6 min
As of
2026-10-15
Volume contents
  1. Abstract
  2. Synthetic case
  3. 01The Demand to Maintain Performance
  4. 02Enforcement Blocked by Simultaneous Performance
  5. 03The Demand That Opens Rescission
  6. 04The State to Be Restored After Rescission
  7. 05The Coexistence of Rescission and Damages
  8. 06The Boundary of the Same Loss

Abstract

This volume asks how the choice to keep or end a contract changes the scope of recovery. Claims for performance, rescission, restitution, and damages each demand a different state of affairs. Only by examining compatibility and counter-performance can the necessary relief be preserved without the same loss being recovered twice. The path to relief opens where the respective requirements for performance, rescission, and damages are satisfied and the performance to be returned and the loss to be compensated are identified without overlap, and closes where, in a delay of performance requiring a demand, the requirements of a demand and non-performance are absent, or where a defense of simultaneous performance prevents an unconditional demand for performance from being enforced. The six sections address, in turn, the demand to maintain performance, the enforcement blocked by simultaneous performance, the demand that opens rescission, the state to be restored after rescission, the coexistence of rescission and damages, and the boundary of the same loss. The strongest counterargument is as follows. Narrowing a party's freedom to assert multiple remedies together weakens protection in uncertain situations. Case design, loss calculation tables, and negotiation closing strategies are not addressed in this volume.

Synthetic case

The whole volume follows this invented case. It is not a real matter, and its facts are not legal findings.

Plaintiff A seeks to end the contract and recover what has already been paid, while also demanding the loss caused by the delay in performance.

6 sections and their questions

  1. 01The Demand to Maintain Performance

    When a contract is not honored, does only damages remain?

    20 min
  2. 02Enforcement Blocked by Simultaneous Performance

    If the opposing party has not performed, may one's own performance always be refused?

    20 min
  3. 03The Demand That Opens Rescission

    Can a contract always be rescinded immediately upon breach of a promise?

    21 min
  4. 04The State to Be Restored After Rescission

    Upon rescission, what becomes of what has already been exchanged?

    20 min
  5. 05The Coexistence of Rescission and Damages

    Does rescinding a contract also mean waiving damages?

    22 min
  6. 06The Boundary of the Same Loss

    May the same detriment be listed repeatedly under different names of claim?

    23 min
You are reading PRO SE
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com